Peace and Reconciliation ministry is ultimately motivated by my love to the Creator, my service to Christ, and my submission to the Comforter. Yet, I have filial motivations for these vision, mission, and activities to which I’m committed — they are my family, especially my grand-children. What I’m doing now is a grandfather’s attempt to contribute to the care and sustainability of this planet for their future.
I pray for them as they grow up in the context of a planet going through ecological crises because of climate change.
Whenever I’m in their presence, in the midst of laughters, I try my best to suspend all my activist ideas and just enjoy each moment with them. Then the day ends. They go to bed and sleep. And I’m left in the living room wondering the kind of planet we’re passing on to them. And all the data I’ve been reading about climate change automatically tabulate themselves in front of my imaginary screen. My natural optimist attitude pale in the presence of the global reality before me. My grandchildren’s window of opportunity is closing. Because of my generation’s neglect and destructive ways, my grandchildren no longer have the luxury of time, and climate delay is almost as dangerous as my generation’s climate denial.
Their generation is expressing anger.
My first grand-daughter is beginning to focus her attention on climate change. She sparked our discussion on this topic as she was doing her homework on Social Studies.
And here we are, grownups who are supposedly caring for them. We have been talking about this crisis for years. Meanwhile, global emissions are reaching record levels and show no sign of peaking. Experts say that the concentration of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is the highest it has been in 3 million years. The United Nations say that the last four years were the four hottest on record, and winter temperatures in the Arctic have risen by 3°C since 1990. In fragile geographical settings such as the Philippines, we significantly notice that sea levels are rising. Those of us who grew up swimming around colorful coral reefs are saddened to see our formerly-alive, underwater playground are dying.
Climate change also threatens the health of my grandchildren. Air pollution. Heatwaves. Risks to food security.
So, I will intensify my commitment to PAR-based ecological advocacy and practice.
Peace and Reconciliation (PAR) is about economic and ecological transformation. PAR is spiritual. PAR is creation care. Creation, from PAR perspective, is seen as an organic-relational world, not merely as a mechanical-utilitarian world. In a mechanical-utilitarian view of the world, the emphasis is exploitation. If one of the parts of the machine-world is not functioning, the tendency is to replace it. Hence, in an unjust system, the natural resources can be exploited for the present, and then later, it can be substituted with synthetic products and artificial solutions.
In an organic-relational world, the emphasis is stewardship and loving care of creation. The biblical story of Creation tells us that “the Lord God formed the mortal (adam) from the dust of the ground (adamah) and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and the mortal became a living being” (Gen. 2:7). These are the dynamic imageries used to give us a grasp of the beginning of the human race. We all came from the ground. We were named after the ground. We are one with Creation. We are one humanity! We are all carbon-based material. We are all breathed with the same breath of God. That is the story of our Being Alive! When the Creator-God commanded us to subdue the Earth (Gen. 1:28), it has the idea of l’shamrah—to care for, to keep, to watch, and to preserve it (Gen. 2:15). Earth-destruction is listed by the Prophet John as a sin (Rev. 11:18). We are all called by the Creator-God to be stewards of Planet Earth! Christians must apply the salam-shalom lifestyle in the stewardship of their resources.
Creation, from shalom perspective, is seen as an organic-relational world, not merely as a mechanical-utilitarian world. In a mechanical-utilitarian view of the world, the emphasis is exploitation. If one of the parts of the machine-world is not functioning, the tendency is to replace it. Hence, in globalism, the natural resources can be exploited for the present, and then later, it can be substituted with technological products and solutions.
Can we really reduce carbon emissions within 12 years and have the political will to limit global warming to 1.5°?
Or, are we going to continue along our current path? What would be the consequences if we continue in this “hell-bound” direction?
Would the big business operating in this planet accelerate climate solutions to strengthen our economies and create jobs, while bringing cleaner air, preserving natural habitats and biodiversity, and protecting our environment?
I am a grandfather who is listening to his grandchildren. Their future energize me to set a new determination to work towards the implementation of the Paris Agreement. For me and my grandchildren, the Climate Summit must be the starting point to build the future we need.